Status of agrifood regulatory coordination under the North American Free Trade Agreement

cepal.bibLevelDocumento Completo
cepal.callNumberINT UN/EC 44(1/2007)
cepal.callNumberLC/L.2797-P
cepal.docTypeSeries
cepal.idSade32268
cepal.jobNumberS0700803 E
cepal.physicalDescriptiongráficos, mapas
cepal.regionalOfficeWashington
cepal.saleNumber07.II.G.131
cepal.topicEngAGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
cepal.topicEngTRADE FACILITATION
cepal.topicEngTRADE IN GOODS AND SERVICES
cepal.topicEngTRADE POLICY AND TRADE AGREEMENTS
cepal.topicEngINTERNATIONAL TRADE
cepal.topicSpaAGRICULTURA Y DESARROLLO RURAL
cepal.topicSpaFACILITACIÓN DEL COMERCIO
cepal.topicSpaCOMERCIO DE BIENES Y SERVICIOS
cepal.topicSpaPOLÍTICA COMERCIAL Y ACUERDOS COMERCIALES
cepal.topicSpaCOMERCIO INTERNACIONAL
cepal.workareaEngINTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INTEGRATION
cepal.workareaEngSTATISTICS
cepal.workareaSpaCOMERCIO INTERNACIONAL E INTEGRACIÓN
cepal.workareaSpaESTADÍSTICAS
dc.contributor.authorKnutson, Ronald D.
dc.contributor.authorOchoa, René F.
dc.coverage.spatialEngMEXICO
dc.coverage.spatialEngNORTH AMERICA
dc.coverage.spatialSpaAMERICA DEL NORTE
dc.coverage.spatialSpaMEXICO
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-02T15:42:30Z
dc.date.available2014-01-02T15:42:30Z
dc.date.issued2007-10
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliography
dc.description.abstractSince its initiation on January 1, 1994, the agriculture section of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has been controversial, which has led to several trade disputes, suggestions for modification and strengthening, and even Presidential initiatives such as the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). While NAFTA has done much to spur economic growth and development, it has not realized its potential in integrating agrifood markets. Several illustrations are summarized in this report on progress in overcoming sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) barriers to trade under NAFTA; much remains to be accomplished. The basic problem is the NAFTA agreement itself, which lacks a strong NAFTA Secretariat that is charged with moving the NAFTA agrifood economic and market integration agenda forward. While this could best be accomplished by modifying the NAFTA agreement to form an EU Commission type body, without authorization for a common market or an economic union, this option is not politically feasible in an environment where anti-free trade advocates are prevalent.
dc.formatTexto
dc.format.extent37 páginas.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.isbn9789211216578
dc.identifier.unSymbolLC/L.2797-P
dc.identifier.unSymbolLC/WAS/L.91
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11362/5062
dc.language.isoeng
dc.physicalDescription37 p. : gráfs., mapas
dc.publisherECLAC
dc.publisher.placeWashington, D.C.
dc.relation.isPartOfSeriesStudies and Perspectives Series (Washington, DC)
dc.relation.isPartOfSeriesNo1
dc.rights.coarDisponible
dc.rights.coarDisponible
dc.subject.unbisEngAGRICULTURAL TRADE
dc.subject.unbisEngEXPORTS
dc.subject.unbisEngFREE TRADE
dc.subject.unbisEngRULES AND REGULATIONS
dc.subject.unbisEngTRADE FACILITATION
dc.subject.unbisEngTREATIES
dc.subject.unbisEngNAFTA
dc.subject.unbisEngTRADE IN SERVICES
dc.subject.unbisSpaNAFTA
dc.subject.unbisSpaCOMERCIO AGRICOLA
dc.subject.unbisSpaEXPORTACIONES
dc.subject.unbisSpaFACILITACION DEL COMERCIO
dc.subject.unbisSpaLIBRE COMERCIO
dc.subject.unbisSpaREGLAS Y NORMAS
dc.subject.unbisSpaTRATADOS
dc.subject.unbisSpaCOMERCIO DE SERVICIOS
dc.titleStatus of agrifood regulatory coordination under the North American Free Trade Agreement
dc.type.coarlibro
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication69de8bdb-367f-4c4f-84ef-501d6853b1cb
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb1a395bb-9b91-4c12-8c44-dc8b111fd2f0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery69de8bdb-367f-4c4f-84ef-501d6853b1cb
Descargar
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
S0700803_en.pdf
Tamaño:
231.73 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Document in English